The Sound ... Of A Brand New World
By all rights, I should be a Radiohead fanatic. As a teenager growing up in the 1990's, I was the band's target audience; an angsty, disillusioned, awkward teenage male. In an alternate universe, I would have identified with the angst and self-revulsion of Creep when that song came out when I was in the 7th grade. I would have gotten swept up in the anthemic stylings of The Bends as a freshman, and I would have grown with the band as they moved into the more epic guitar rock of OK Computer (before my senior year) and then in the direction of electronica with Kid A (junior year of college) and Amnesiac (before my senior year of college). I've known more than a few people for whom Radiohead is an essential part of who they are, both because of the quality of the music and because of when in their lives the various albums came out, and that could have easily been the case with me as well.
Alas, that's not how it happened. I didn't care at all about rock and pop music until late 1995, and even after then I spent a number of years stuck in a "modern music is always inferior to older music" mindset. My high school musical love was The Moody Blues, and my early college years were almost exclusively spent assimilating various classic rock and art rock bands. It wasn't until summer of 2001, after the band had released Amnesiac, that I ever heard a Radiohead album (I had seen Radiohead's infamous performance of National Anthem on Saturday Night Live, but at the time it confused me more than anything), and by this time it was pretty much too late for me to form a deep emotional bond with the band. I keep stressing this point because I really can't shake the sense that Radiohead is a band that strongly requires an emotional investment if one is to adore their output on the whole. I mean, I don't have that emotional bond and I still really like them and a lot of their songs, but I don't ever see them making the leap to all-time great status in my musical tastes. It also doesn't help that I really don't get much out of the band's lyrics on the whole. I mean, it's not like they're obviously bad or anything, but few of their songs really connect with me deeply or anything. That said, even though I don't often get a lot out of the lyrics, I do tend to get a lot out of how Yorke sings them, so that certainly helps.
Regardless, the band has a lot of songs I really like, and after their first album (which almost nobody likes anyway), none of their albums fall below the "very good" level in my ears (which says something given that I'm not pre-disposed to music from the 90's and beyond). Furthermore, it's really fascinating to hear how the band has developed stylistically over the years. From the unremarkable generic alternative rock stylings of Pablo Honey, the band turned itself into kind of a 90's version of the 80's U2, coming up with half an album of first-rate anthemic guitar rock (that other half isn't very impressive, but we'll get to that later). Then instead of doing a retread, the band pushed its guitar rock in a dark, epic direction (with other instruments effectively used as needed) that led to a bunch of totally incredible songs and an album that lots of people I know regard as one of the best of all time (OK Computer).
For a followup, the band could have continued to mine the same vein, and they probably would have continued to have some success with it. Instead, though, the band made what must be considered one of the gutsiest decisions in rock music since Dylan went electric, and definitely one of the gutsiest in my lifetime. That decision, of course, was to turn from guitar rock to a weird stew of influences (largely incorporating "electronica" but largely moving beyond categorization) that strayed incredibly far from the music that had given Radiohead their break into the mainstream. I might not have cared one way or another about Radiohead at the time Kid A came out, but I knew several people who liked them, and I remember very clearly the polarizing effect that album had on them when it came out. Some of these people appreciated the new direction and liked the new sonic textures, but a lot of people couldn't get past the relative lack of guitar and the "pointless difficulty" of the songs. Personally, I think it's their masterpiece, and I'm sure it got a good number of people into the band who didn't care about them before, but if the people I knew was a good sample, a lot of the band's existing fans jumped ship and didn't come back (Amnesiac, which largely sounded like a weirder version of Kid A, didn't help matters much along those lines).
The band eventually brought back guitars a little more into the sound, but the band never returned its sound to anything I would call "mainstream," and that's to their credit. One could criticize their later albums for sounding like "Radiohead trying to sound like Radiohead," but they write good songs in this vein, and that's nothing to sneeze at. And that's really what makes Radiohead worthwhile for me; especially starting with OK Computer, the majority of Radiohead songs make me think, "wow, what a great idea" at least once when I'm listening to them. Granted, only Kid A and a few other songs from various albums make me think or feel much more than that, and I rarely feel a compulsion to listen to their music, but good songwriting and good arrangement/production ideas gets you a long way with me.
Before I get to the reviews, I need to point out that I probably know less about the individual members of the band than I do about any band I've reviewed to this point. I know that Thom Yorke is the lead singer and that he plays guitar, and I know that one of the other guitarists is named Jonny Greenwood, but I really don't know anything about the rest of them. I really don't know who's responsible for what general aspect of the band's sound, or who contributes what percentage of the songwriting, or whatever. Like I said before, I guess I just got into the band too late to bother to learn more about it.
What do you think of Radiohead?
nestor eduardo escobar alfonso (nescobar_91@hotmail.com) (06/15/08)
Hi, my name's Nestor, I'm from Colombia, and I'm a big fan of your
site (as well as fan of "non-professional" music reviewers,
particularly of Capn Marvel and yer russian clone), I was too busy to
write anything before, but since I saw you were going to edit your
Radiohead page, I thought it was the right time to start sending my
thoughts on musical matters. OK, so, according to how I see the big
order of music things Radiohead are the most important band of the
last 13 years, since, well, grunge's demise. Personally, as a
teenager that has spent like the last 3 or 4 years of his life loving
their music and admiring them as his one of his favourite bands is
impossible not having some bias towards the band (ala George with CCR
or you with The Moody Blues!). They've released amazingly fillerless,
consistent and well constructed albums with some of the greatest
songs of the last decade. But that's not the only thing that amazes
me. They're quite possibly the most original and diverse band of this
century, quickly evolving from album to album (something true at
least for every album pre-Hail to the Thief) and, as you said,
defying categorisation (they're usually tagged as "alterrnative",
though I can hear electronic, some jazz-fusion, some krautrock
influences, some trip-hop... whatever), although obviously borrowing
a lot of influences from 60's (isn't Karma Police piano intro a
ripoff of Sexy Sadie? Oh, and Yorke acknowledged influences of
Happiness is a Warm Gun for Paranoid Android) and 70's (perhaps the
post-punk scene, although you can hear a lot of the "old Floyd
tricks" in their guitar and atmospheric sound. And, of course, the
acknowledged and aforementioned influnce from krautrock -Like
Spinning Plates = Can's Oh Yeah, isn't it?-). And, for good or bad,
they've exerted a lot of influence over a new breed of music makers.
From me, the band easily gets a ****.
Even with all those praises, I DO understand why someone like you,
who were supposed to be part of the band's audience and main target,
would put A BIT down their stuff, believe me, have I been of your age
in the middle 90's and have discovered so-called "classic rock" at
that time, I would have had problems digging their music. And also I
understand not liking Yorke's lyricism, is may not be any
better, shattering and, at first impression, more emotional than, say
Roger Waters', John Lennon's or Pete Townshend's one, but I guess
that everyone will sort it by themselves (doesn't How to Disappear
Completely strucks you as deeply emotional?). Oh, and guess that you
need some help with the whole band member thing, here is a short
review of them:
Thom Yorke (guitar, lead vocals, piano): One of the most amazing
falsettos in rock history. His singing is so expressive, and his
lyricism, well, is pretty dark yet beautiful. The soul of the band
and an example of a front man for the post-modern world. And perhaps
the master mind behind the band's shift over the turn of the century,
along perhaps with...
Jonny Greenwood (lead guitar, lots of instruments, string
arrangements): the band most trained instrumentalist
(multi-instrumentalist, in fact!), has some classical music
background, and has brought some vital elements to the table (lush
string arrangements, ondes martenot, keyboards), although is an
amazing guitar player too, building upon the "David Gilmouresque
effects" legacy.
Ed O'Brien (guitar, backing vocals): The one on the band who
has struggled the most with the band's move since Kid A and the most
rock-oriented member on the band, although I guess he has
experimented also a bit...
And a solid rhythm section represented by Colin Greenwood (yes,
brother of Jonny) , creator of some amazing basslines (Planet Telex,
How to Disappear..., 15 Step), and Phil Selway on percussion.
I have a lot to write about, but guess that whatever comes next
corresponds to the album reviews... keep on the good work...
Best song: Creep I guess
The album more or less gets off to a good start with the first two tracks. You seems a bit too saturated with rather pointless heaviness for my tastes (a big problem with much of the album), but I do like the shiny quiet guitar line that opens the song and pops up in bits here and there later, and the song does have some decent (if a little cheap) anthemic qualities to it. Creep ended up as a minor hit for the band, and even if I don't feel any real connection with the lyrics, it does have what I consider the album's most fascinating moment. Yup, my favorite part of the album is that bit before the chorus where the heavy guitar sound plays two quick notes in succession, like the song's being shot or something, then pauses, then plays those notes again right before going into the chorus. It doesn't make the song brilliant or anything, but it makes me want to listen to it again.
The rest of the album seems like one mildly bland generic song after another, with maybe one or two exceptions. The songs aren't much worse than the first two of the album, but the first two weren't so hot in the first place, so that's not a compliment. Stop Whispering lets up on the heaviness just enough to allow a decent dose of songwriting to shine through (Thom is REALLY going for a Bono-style delivery here, too), and Prove Yourself is a decent enough two minute song (however much of an irresponsible call for its listeners to kill themselves it might be), but the other songs don't do much for me. I admit to being intrigued as to the use of a guitar sound in Anybody Can Play Guitar that sounds uncannily like it's from the second side of David Bowie's Heroes, but that and the namedrop of Jim Morrison are the only moments in the song that hold my interest.
As with seemingly most Radiohead fans, I just can't enjoy this one so much. I can put it on as background noise, and some of the tracks have aspects I enjoy, but I could never consider this as a lost gem or anything like that. For completists only.
David Andino (davidandino83@msn.com) (06/01/08)
in the u.k., radiohead had a hard time competing against blur and
oasis. oasis are loud brutes while blur are more good guy versions of
a rock band. radiohead struggled with pablo honey. hey, john, do you
play video games? if so creep was used in ROCK BAND! I play so sloppy
on the guitar. the game guitar which makes jimmy page sound like
michael jordan in comparison! strange. have you played rock band on
guitar? anyway the band was haunted forever when the song was a hit
and in live concerts people are requesting it but the band denied.
even george hates the album. why does everybody treat it like a piece
of dirty clothing? I liked it.
Best song: Street Spirit (Fade Out)
Indeed, as hard as I try, I cannot get excited about the two tracks after the album's opening (and superb) quartet, or about the four tracks between Just and the closing Street Spirit (Fade Out). I don't see what's so special about Bones (despite all of the guitar effects) or Nice Dream (a low key number with an okayish melody but which I keep feeling should have more going for it than it does), and slogging through the four tracks after Just is something I never really enjoy. My Iron Lung has a pretty nice quiet guitar line in the beginning and throughout, but the other song elements, particularly the noisy section about half way through, don't make me very happy. Bullet Proof ... I Wish I Was has some neat effects like what I'd expect from early Pink Floyd, but as pleasant as the song is, it largely passes me by each time (it's probably the best of the album's weaker half, anyway). Black Star is the kind of song I could easily see somebody loving, as it has all sorts of strong anthemic elements, but it's never moved me much at all, and the melody isn't that enjoyable to me. And as for Sulk, well, the only thing I ever remember about it is that I want to start singing Fireplace by R.E.M. when I hear the opening measures. So on the whole, these tracks just evoke a strong "meh" and shrug of my shoulders, and that's not something that I can square with the notion of an all-time great album.
The other six tracks are terrific, though, and if the rest had been able to keep pace with these tracks, I'd definitely rate this much higher. Pretty much the only thing I can say bad about them is that they don't mean much to me, even if I can see how they could mean a lot to other people. This isn't to say I don't feel anything while listening to them, but rather that those feelings don't stick around very long past the end of the song/album, and that I don't really feel like they're an essential part of my musical diet.
Otherwise, they're pretty great on the whole. If I had to pick one as noticably weaker than the others, I'd probably go with the title track, but it's still got some very nice guitar lines and a good enough delivery from Thom. Planet Telex, which comes before it, is much better, from the effect-laden introduction to the good vocal melody to the various neat guitar textures, ESPECIALLY in the "Everything is broken ..." section. The two ballads (sort of) that come after the title track are also fantastic. High and Dry has a marvelous vocal melody in both the verses and the chorus, and Fake Plastic Trees, as clear an imitation of classic U2 it might be, combines some great moving chord sequences with some really tender singing once again from Thom.
My two favorites, though, are Just and Street Spirit (Fade Out). I couldn't care less about the lyrical message in Just, but the way Thom sings "you do it to yourself, you do" is one of the strongest hooks on the album, and the band's approach to heaviness in the guitar parts (which are like a mad scientist's take on typical grunge lines, and I mean that in a good way) makes the song one that I keep coming back to. And finally, Street Spirit (Fade Out) features a fascinating rolling guitar line and an interesting layering of arrangements, but more importantly to me it has a very strong atmosphere of darkness that the band hadn't really shown to this point. Obviously the band probably didn't intend this at the time, but this is the track the most strongly points the way to the band's future; a dark, depressing world and sound that far transcends conventional angst. For this reason, I actually think it sounds a little out of place on the album, but it's better for it.
I really think that part of this album's appeal lies in the fact that it follows the classic Who's Next formula: start and end strong, and stuff all the weaker songs into the middle. Unfortunately, the weaker songs really bug me, and the better songs aren't spectacular enough to cover up that impression, so the album's rating suffers. Still, it's quite a nice album, and it's worth picking up.
David Andino (davidandino83@msn.com) (06/01/08)
don't be so hard on yourself! radiohead fans will smite you for this.
a 7??????????! the bends is the G.O.A.T. ha to all you dumb rappers!
the bends has fake plastic trees and the video was so good the the
old mtv show 120 minuets kept playing it. I don't know if you seen
120 minuets befroe mtv fell off a cliff and crashed and bleeding and
never got up and died! 1995 was a great year for rough production.
mellon collie, one hot minute, balance, ozzmosis, foo fighters,
morning glory and the blur album and this record. in terms of sales
the dumb brutes from oasis won the battle for sales but radiohead won
critical respect.
Best song: Let Down or No Surprises
Personally, I don't think this comes close to an all-time great album (and it didn't save anything in rock music, that's for sure), but I sure don't buy into the inevitable anti-hype either. My main problem with the album comes not from the excessive praise it's received over the years, or the fact that its originality is largely overstated by many of the band's fans, but rather from a stretch in the middle that I enjoy less with each listen. Unless one has a heavy emotional investment in the concept of the album, and views the track as the album's keystone, I don't see how Fitter, Happier can be considered anything but a stupifying waste of two minutes. The Stephen Hawking imitation voice, listing all of the various good things to do to keep healthy and sane, always annoys me within fifteen seconds, and the album would be seriously improved without it. The next two tracks aren't much better, either. Electioneering is a go-nowhere piece of dissonant boogie rock, and Climbing Up the Walls just strikes me as deeply unpleasant and ugly (that it's one of the longer songs on the album doesn't help either). So that's almost a full quarter of the album down the drain right there.
I really like the rest of the album, though. I don't feel the kind of reverence towards the songs that many feel, and I don't find myself going out of my way to listen to them very often, but it would be hard for me not to enjoy and respect a bunch of songs this well arranged, produced and written. My two favorites are Let Down and No Surprises, which do the dreamy guitar pop lullaby genre (if such a genre exists outside this album) proud with fantastic melodies, vocal parts that nobody else could do justice, and, in the former, some effective subtle rhythmic unrest. I'm also quite fond of Subterranean Homesick Alien, whose guitars create one of the more beautifully bizarre atmospheres I've ever heard.
The more intense side of the band is effectively demonstrated in Paranoid Android, which effortlessly moves from a quiet driving mix of acoustic and electric guitars (all pinned down by subtle percussion that always makes the acoustic parts sound Spanish to me, even though I have no idea why) to a more obviously powerful electric section with a fantastic riff and some good over-the-top soloing. And, of course, it then moves into the amazing "rain down" section, led by some great atmospheric vocals from Yorke, before going back in the heavier direction.
Some of the other songs don't thrill me as much as I'd like, but they have their nice attributes all the same. Exit Music (for a Film) is most notable to me for its heavy use of a mellotron (if it's not a mellotron, then it's something that sounds really close to it), and while I don't think it's anywhere near as beautiful or moving as lots of people think, I still find it kinda pretty in its own sad way. I think it would be far exceeded, though, by How to Disappear Completely, on the next album. Karma Police is a little bit boring, but the piano part in the chorus more or less saves it. And finally, Lucky is almost nothing but mood and wailing Gilmour-esque guitar parts, but it does well in both of these aspects, so it's a keeper.
Finally, I want to say something about the opening and closing tracks. Airbag, as many people like to point out, actually feels like a musical interpretation of a car crash, or rather the hallucinogenic experience of the person within the car during and after it (the actual car crashing would sound more like Metal Machine Music, I'm sure). What should stand out most in the song, though, is not so much the music, and also not the main expository line of the song, "I'm amazed that I survived, an airbag saved my life." No, what's most important (and I just realized that Jeff Blehar said nearly the same thing in his review many years ago, but it's so true) is the creeped out feeling of elation that comes from it, expressed in the "in an interstellar burst, I'm back to save the universe" line. From surviving this accident comes a momentary feeling of invincibility, a newly found superpower, if you will, and the feeling that this second chance at life suddenly brings with it all sorts of meaning.
The Tourist, then, brings the album full circle; I am very skeptical of the idea that the tourist in question is somehow not involved in the car accident that prompts Airbag. The anthemic calls of "hey...man..sloooow down...," underpinned by a fantastic set of chord sequences, create an extremely vivid, almost cinematic set of imagery for me, and that impresses the hell out of me. Maybe the song is actually a call to the listener to slow down the pace of one's life in this busy hectic world, but my interpretation is the one that's going to make me care about the song.
So, while I may not fall in line with the general consensus that says this is one of the best albums ever, I still think it's a really nice album. Cut out the tracks I really don't like, and this could easily be a 13 (though higher probably wouldn't happen either). And, of course, it's still a necessity for any decent collection of rock music, no matter the era one mainly focuses on.
Andrew Galperin (andrew_galperin@yahoo.com) (06/01/08)
Well, it's been many years since I was first fascinated by this album
and it became my favorite of all time...I loved every aspect of it -
the incredible hooks, how the pseudo-concept came together, the
moods, the textures, etc. Speculation that it was based on the novel
"1984" even prompted me to read that book, which is awesome in its
own right, albeit not really related to the album.
Anyway, since then, I've kind of gotten away from art-rock and moved
in more of a Starostin/McFerrin direction towards appreciating music
(not on purpose, of course)...That is, nowadays I seem to be less
impressed with pure atmosphere and more impressed by catchy
songwriting and things like that. So why am I writing all this BS?
Basically to say that, if you strip away the concept, the lyrics, the
unrelated-to-the-actual-music emotional investment and much of the
other stuff from OK Computer and just keep the songwriting and the
production, it's still one of the best all-time handful of albums,
IMO. "Lucky is almost nothing but mood and wailing Gilmour-esque
guitar parts"? Seriously?? Isn't the "We're standing on the edge"
part one of the most amazing simple hooks ever written? The first
time I listened to that song, that segment made my jaw drop, and
still does to an extent. What about "hey, man, slow down?" in The
Tourist? That has to be tied for the title of "catchiest simple
chorus ever" with ELO's Laredo Tornado. Besides, what a contrast
with the "indifferent" jazz chords the song starts out with.
"Electioneering is a go-nowhere piece of dissonant boogie rock"?
What about The Riff, and the way it skips an octave up for a couple
of notes in the intro? That is an awesome riff right there, partly
because of the way the guitar is tuned...and I love the way the
guitar strings sound "drunk" towards the end. I don't even care that
the vocal melody is so-so.
Anyway, I could go on and on...surprisingly, I think you actually
like "Let Down" more than I do...I think it's one of the weaker songs
on the album, and perhaps the only one that doesn't have a catchy
melody or almost any hooks, at least by your definition of "hooks" as
I understand it. THAT song is pure atmosphere...not Lucky.
Next week, I'll probably be writing about how you OVERrated Kid A,
hehe.
Best song: How To Disappear Completely or Idioteque
I have NEVER gotten the supposed excessive difficulty of this album. I mean, it's certainly a less immediately accessible album than The Bends, as it's far from the guitar rock style of that album, but I don't buy for a second the idea that Kid A is some unlistenable monster. One thing that is obvious is that this album draws from different influences than The Bends and the bulk of OK Computer; this one reeks of Brian Eno, "post-rock"/electronica, Can and even old-school free jazz (the saxophones in National Anthem). The thing is, though, with the possible exception of the free jazz influences, I can't buy the notion that any of these sources are really that difficult to absorb. You just have to have a taste for music that relies on more than just strong melodies and immediately understandable lyrical topics to enjoy them. True, many people essentially think that such music has no real emotional power and can only be enjoyed by pretentious people, but I find that mentality somwhere between pitiful and loathsome. I like well-done pop music too, but focusing only on melody as a worthwhile element of music while ignoring mood, texture, and half a dozen other features just seems ridiculous to me.
Why do I rate Kid A so highly? It's simple, really: every track on here works on some level that I can appreciate and enjoy. The melodies aren't usually immediately memorable, which puts off a lot of people, but that's because they aim to succeed in other ways. For instance, take what I consider the album's weakest track (which I still enjoy plenty), In Limbo. This is actually one of the more guitar-centered tracks on the album, full of quiet arpeggiation, but what makes the track work is the disorienting, chaotic and hazy layering of the vocals. The only easily discernable lyrics in the piece come whenever Thom sings "You're living in a fantasy world," and that's fitting in a track that feels like a weird dream happening close to reality but not quite in it. In other words, it's a track that reminds me of what a limbo state would be like.
I like the album's most controversial track, the ambient instrumental Treefingers, for a similar reason. A lot of people consider this the quintessential example of the album's problems; a boring, go-nowhere drone that should have been an outtake. The thing is, though, as with the best of Eno's ambient work, I have little difficulty associating this track with a specific mental image. Every time I listen to this track, I envision myself in a forest after dark, surrounded by endlessly tall trees with long branches. As the track develops, the branches of the trees around me bend down and grab me, slowly raising me high above the ground to a giant black mouth in the sky. It is a deeply unsettling set of images that fits a deeply unsettling track, and I wouldn't trade it for the world.
The rest of the album, on the whole, is just fantastic. Everything in its Right Place is a perfect introduction, both in terms of establishing the album's sound (the music in the track is driven almost solely by soft, understated keyboards) and in terms of establishing the album's general mood (one of crushing paranoia, confusion and despair). I've noticed that a lot of people are bothered by the fact that the vocal melody isn't strong in any traditional sense, and that the lyrics aren't immediately coherent, and that there are a lot of backwards vocals stuffed into the background. Now, I'm not exactly somebody who automatically loves songs that include elements like this, but I am somebody who likes it when elements of this nature obviously have a point, and this track delivers. The title track, then, must have thrown fans of the band for a complete loop, as it's a total "post-rock" electronica piece that deviates far from any definition of "song" the band had previously used. What fascinates me most about the track is not the main portion, a mix of completely indiscernable processed vocals, synth textures and drum sounds that sound like they're from Peking-O (by Can), but rather the simple, somewhat off-kilter piano line that starts the piece and pops up again later. It reminds me a LOT of a computer game from the early 90's called The 7th Guest, which was basically a puzzle game set in a haunted house where a bunch of people died. Aside from the ridiculous upbeat ending (which still seems tacked on to me and which was one of the most shattering disappointments of my youth), that game has one of the creepiest atmospheres I have ever come across, and anything that can remind me of it is ok in my book.
The National Anthem is another track that a lot of fans seem to hate, though just as many seem to like it. One thing I think is a mistake is to put too much emphasis, for good or bad, on the chaotic horn soloing that largely takes over the track near the end. I think there are lot of people that basically say, "Oh, a track that has complicated free jazz discord, this automatically makes it a great track," and I also think there are a lot of people that basically say, "Oh, a track that has complicated free jazz discord, this automatically makes it horrible." Well, I know some people will disagree with me, but I really see the sax parts as a finishing touch on the song, and not the main feature (the live version on I Might be Wrong does just fine without it), so pegging one's attitude on the song to one's feeling on the horn seems overdone to me. I'm personally more enthralled with the simple, yet powerful bassline, the disorienting vocals, the creepy synths, and the overall paranoid effect of the piece.
How to Disappear Completely is the album's most accessible track (at heart it's just a sad acoustic ballad), but that's not the reason I consider it one of the highest points on the album. I mean, this is just a masterful depression anthem, with amazing synth string parts giving an epic sweep as Thom gives an amazing performance, culminating in each repetition of the line, "I'm not here, this isn't happening." And don't forget the way the sound just kinda dissolves in the end. It's probably my favorite Radiohead song, for what it's worth. Then, after Treefingers, we come to Optimistic, which probably would have been a more accessible track had it been made five years previous. It's a nice piece of discordant guitar rock, with guitars that (for whatever reason) remind me a lot of The Velvet Underground and a memorable melody that gets catchier with each listen.
Upon my first listen to Idioteque, I really had no idea what I thought of it. Part of me had the reaction that I'm sure occurred in some form with a lot of listeners, namely that I didn't really like the idea of Radiohead making a song that so resembled dance pop, what with its emphasis on electronic beats. Well, in thinking that, I think I completely missed the point of the song, and I'm not just talking about the lyrics (which have a very apocalyptic feel). What the song captures perfectly for me, and I'm serious here, is a sense of utter despair at the disconnect I feel with those around me when I watch other people enjoying themselves dancing, particularly to beat-heavy music. You have to understand: I don't like dancing (in the "clubbing" sort of way) at all, but more than that I hate being around people who are enjoying themselves dancing, because it reinforces to me that I am fundamentally different from everybody else who is enjoying themselves, and watching people dance always triggers a deep (if temporary) fit of depression within me. Well, everything about this song properly captures that feeling, from the mournful chords playing over and over, to the fact that it's nearly impossible to actually dance to the song, to the weird clanging breakdown in the middle, to the paranoid, frightening vocals. This is the only song I can think of that properly captures and articulates my feelings on this, and even if this wasn't part of the intended point from the band, and even if I have other reasons to enjoy the song, this is enough to make it seem like a classic to me.
The closing two tracks always seem like a comedown to me after Idioteque, but I still like them a lot. Morning Bell, when you cut through the arrangements (heavily based in keyboards), is basically a pretty standard pop song, albeit one with Thom repeatedly singing "Cut the kids in half" or "Release me." And finally, Motion Picture Soundtrack might have started its life as an acoustic number (which Thom wanted on OK Computer), but I really like the way it's presented here. I like the idea of a song about death prominently featuring an organ (or something sounding like it), and I especially like the idea of a song with the lines, "Stop sending letters/Letters always get burned/It's not like the movies/They fed us on little white lies" including a bunch of cheezy Hollywood-style harps (in a sharp dose of irony). This is a sad, bitter, bleak song, and the fact that it ends on so much silence (I guess symbolizing death) is only appropriate.
I guess it really ends up coming down to what you want from Radiohead, and what you think they do best. I'm actually (still) a little surprised that I enjoy this album as much as I do, since I'm certainly more inclined towards guitar rock than this kind of music, but the fact remains that I feel that Radiohead do this kind of music better than they did guitar rock. Simply put, I consider this one of the most essential albums to come after 1990, and it's an absolute must for any collection.
Best song: I Might Be Wrong or Knives Out
The album bunches all of the "normal" songs into the middle, in a move that seems a little odd to me. Despite how much I enjoyed the experimentation on the last album, these are easily my favorites of Amnesiac. I Might be Wrong boasts an extremely effective riff that plays well off of the various "modern" (circa 2001) percussion rhythms, and Thom delivers a performance that reeks (in a good way) of snide cynicism. Knives Out sounds just like a typical OK Computer track, with a great set of guitar lines and a hell of a dark vibe (it appears to be about cannibalism), and because of that it's not surprising that so many fans clamored for this track to make it onto a proper studio album. And finally, Amnesiac/Morning Bell is a reworking of the Kid A version of the track, as the arrangement now centers around slow guitars instead of keyboards, and it's quite nice.
The other eight tracks, though, are all over the map. Quite a few of them, as has been pointed out by some others, work better as ideas than as completed tracks, and don't feel quite done yet. The most obvious offender is Hunting Bears, a two minute guitar (mostly) instrumental that basically keeps playing a single line (that's not that great) over and over again, and it clearly should have been left off the album. Pyramid Song works more as a mood song than anything else, as the piano chords and various synth wails sound pretty and sad, and largely cover up the seemingly directionless nature of the song. I guess it would help if I could figure out exactly what mood the band tried to convey here. Some tracks, like the opening Packt Like Sardines in a Crushd Tin Box, or Pull/Pulk Revolving Doors, or Like Spinning Plates, basically take a few off-kilter electronic rhythms and textures and build an entire song around them, with some singing that doesn't really have much of an effect one way or the other. I mean, I basically like these tracks, but I still find them a little off-putting, and I don't "get" them the way I do a lot of the Kid A material. I do like the closing Life in a Glass House, with some effective and unexpected use of big band sounds, but the other two (You and Whose Army?, Dollars and Cents) more or less pass me by every time I hear them.
So basically, I still don't really know what to think of this album. My inclination is that I quite like the album overall, and that parts of it are great, but it still confuses me in a lot of places. I'd rather listen to this album straight through than The Bends, which is why it gets a slightly higher grade, but I can't go higher than that. Fans of the band will definitely want this, but others should probably make sure they like Kid A a lot before getting this one.
Best song: Idioteque
True Love Waits, the unreleased track, is very much a stripped-down, "traditional" Radiohead song, featuring only an acoustic guitar and Thom's voice, and it's quite lovely. I don't know if this was written earlier than the Kid A sessions, or if it was just one of the few bits of straight-ahead normalcy they put together then, but either way it's quite a lovely song, and I'd take it over any of the weaker Bends songs. If there's any reason for people who prefer the more mainstream Radiohead to give this a listen, this is it.
The album's target audience, though, is people who enjoyed the last two albums, and who'd be curious to see how on earth they'd perform such intricate and meticulous material on stage. Well, they did it, and incredibly well. The Amnesiac material is practically revelatory, especially Like Spinning Plates, which gets remade as a piano/vocal duet (with some light synth touches here and there) that sounds like something Brian Eno would have come up with on a good day. Dollars and Cents, which I never really noticed on Amnesiac, suddenly strikes me as a neat little dark moody ditty, and I Might be Wrong rides the main groove way better than even on the great studio version.
Of the Kid A material, Morning Bell is done close to the original version, but with noticably more intensity (especially in the drums), and the other three tracks are just mind-blowing. This version of The National Anthem conclusively proves to me that the track works without any of the dissonant saxophones that people harp over, and the main features (the riff, the trippy guitar and synth noises, Thom's energetic vocal breathings and grunts) work amazingly. Everything in its Right Place gets stretched out to almost eight minutes, and it's packed with trippy sampling that magnifies Thom's passionate delivery and the moody electric piano. Best of all is Idioteque, where Thom gives one of the most intense vocal workouts I've ever heard from him, and where the mid-song noise freakout (with some effective processed guitar noise over the keyboard clanging) is one of the great things I've ever heard from the band.
Unfortunately that's it, but the experience is both short and sweet, so I can't complain. As of this writing this is the only officially released live Radiohead, and it shows that the band really has a great sound on stage, so that makes it seem worthwhile to me.
Best song: 2+2=5 or A Punchup At A Wedding
WHAT a collection of songs, though. The band brought back the guitars to its sound in full force, but they also make liberal use of keyboards, "modern" rhythms and various neat production effects, and these combine into one of the most intriguing sonic pallettes I can think of post-70's. And, well, I really like the melodies on here. Of the fourteen tracks on the album, only two really make me drift off in any significant way. One of them, We Suck Young Blood, has a dirgey piano atmosphere not unlike what one would find on some early Procol Harum songs, as well as amusingly morbid handclaps, but five minutes is certainly too long for a track of this nature, and I can see how it would annoy the living hell out of people. I'm also not too fond of The Gloaming, which relies on a monotonous loop that's a little too inhumane and ugly even for my tastes.
But that's only two tracks, leaving a dozen goodies in their wake. The opening 2+2=5 is one of the band's strongest ever tracks, not just for the lyrics (like the "YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING ATTENTION" chorus) but for the way it builds the band's traditional dark, arpeggiated guitar lines (set to non-traditional electronic rhythms, of course) into a rocking monster the likes of which the band hadn't done since The Bends. Plus, kudos should be given to the band for shutting down the song after three minutes; they could have easily extended it to five, and it would have been ok that way, but cutting it off when they do makes it seem that much stronger and more intense.
Sit Down Stand Up seems to have divided fans pretty strongly over the years, particularly for the fact that Thom seemingly says the words "little raindrops" in the frantic coda at least 20 times (I didn't count), but I find it extremely strong. I do admit that it's a little suspicious of the band to have a coda that features the words "little raindrops" when they already had a song (Paranoid Android) that had a section that centered around Thom singing "Rain down ...," but the songs are plenty different otherwise (this is basically a more up-tempo and aggressive version of an average Amnesiac track). Plus, um, the electronic bits sound more than a bit like rain pouring down anyway, so it seems like Thom's singing is a nice atmospheric touch to me.
Sail to the Moon kinda strikes me as a cross between Pyramid Song (the atmospheric, directionless piano foundation) and Subterranean Homesick Alien (the synth line that sounds like the upward guitar line from that song), but that only bothers me a little bit, and the atmosphere matches its title perfectly. Backdrifts has an excellent build from the almost white-noise synth introduction, and combines a great vocal melody with a bunch of other fantastic arrangements. Go to Sleep starts off as a dark acoustic guitar number, before building into an effective "normal" electric rocker, and strikes me as one of the album's standouts.
Where I End and You Begin takes a great quiet bassline and a hypnotic (acoustic) drum rhythm, piles a bunch of synth (and eventually guitar) sounds on top, and features yet ANOTHER great vocal melody and performance from Thom (I'll say it again; I may not care much about what he's singing about most of the time, but I sure tend to like what he's singing). After the standstill of the two weaker tracks, we come to There There, which probably sums up the album's overall sound better than any other track here (that's probably why it was chosen as a single). It starts as yet another hypnotic percussion rhythm, adds an effective set of guitar lines, features yet another fantastic vocal melody, and rides this groove well for over five minutes (picking up intensity in the last minute or so). It passed me by the first couple of times I listened to it, but I don't really get that now.
After the quiet beauty of I Will (a bit of a throwaway at 1:59, but a nice track nonetheless), we come to my other favorite track of the album, A Punchup at a Wedding. What can I say, I absolutely love the interplay of the moody piano lines with the drums and bass, and I especially love the tense vocal line. Plus, I'm absolutely fascinated by the mix of grumbly guitar pounding in the left speaker and the quiet plinky guitar (synth? I dunno) line that pops up midway through the song.
Myxomatosis might annoy some people, but I totally love the over-the-top distortion of the weird bassline, and it makes me like the song even if the rest of it doesn't have anything I find extremely notable. Scatterbrain sounds a bit like an OK Computer outtake, especially in the guitars, but I like it; I'd have been thrilled to have this track on there instead of one of that album's weaker tracks. And finally, the closing A Wolf at the Door features yet another fascinating Yorke delivery, with him delivering really disturbing and disorienting imagery at a very fast pace, while all the while the guitars are playing a perfect set of lines. Plus, the "chorus" melody is uplifting and heartwarming in its own way, even if the lyrics are just as disturbing as ever.
I really don't know how many people would agree with rating this higher than OK Computer, but to me it's pretty much a no-brainer. This one may borrow some ideas from that one, but I really think this has more interesting arrangements and a deeper sonic texture, and this one doesn't tightly tie itself to a concept that I never found that interesting in the first place. I know that my opinions on music from this era probably aren't worth much, but this is one of the more enjoyable albums I've heard from the 1990's onward, and I heartily recommend it.
Best song: It's very even
The result both impresses me and leaves me feeling a little let down. All ten tracks are pretty interesting, and well-developed, and make the album worthy of a very high grade. On the other hand, though, while none of the individual tracks shows this strongly, the album feels a little bit half-assed to me. I don't know this for certainty, but I've been told that a good number of the tracks on here had been live staples for quite some time, meaning that Radiohead hadn't so much made a new album as they'd put together a collection of outtakes from older sessions. This formula doesn't necessarily spell doom, of course; the Rolling Stones album Tattoo You follows much the same principal, and that's one of my favorite albums of all time. I can't help but shake the feeling when listening to this, though, that I'm just listening to a solid b-sides compilation, and that was the case even before I was told about the history behind these tracks.
Well, I can't help but feel that Radiohead could have done better than this. The analogy that comes to my mind is being a teacher where you have one student who should absolutely be acing all of his homework and tests, but instead ends up finishing the class with a B+ because he just didn't put in enough effort to get it done (I should know, I practically made a career out of being that student, years ago). It's hard to accept that Radiohead, after not a tremendous number of albums, would have already entered the "coasting" part of their career, but this album suggests just that, and does so rather strongly. Nothing sounds like a direct rip off of any specific songs, but almost all of the elements feel like they've been used at least a few times already, and it wears me down a bit.
This is an awful lot of complaining for an album that I still insist deserves a 12, though (it's a really low one, though, one I keep wanting to change to an 11 until I realize that I'd be giving this the same grade as Amnesiac). This may be, essentially, a b-sides compilation, but it's an absolutely top-notch b-sides compilation, and if it had been released as such I'd probably have a much more positive attitude towards the material on the whole. Few of the individual songs leave a significant mark in my mind, and none of them feel like they're an essential part of the band's career, but every single track has at least something really neat going for it. 15 Step starts off driven by Thom singing falsetto over what feels like a somewhat generic "tricky" electronic rhythm, but instruments just keep getting layered on top slowly and the sound just keeps getting richer until it turns into some sort of 2008 version of late 60's psychedelic symphonic pop. Bodysnatchers kinda sounds like an undercooked Hail to the Thief track, with a rather simplistic, cacophonous riff that's not that terrific, but the song does a good job of integrating weird guitar sounds into the fold, so it can stick around, too. Plus, the melody kinda completely changes in the second half, and it's a drastic improvement.
Nude would mostly pass me by, as it's a pretty dull slow ballad, were it not for the way some of the guitar and synth noodling at the beginning (and in parts of the middle) sounds so much like Robert Fripp messing around with Frippertronics, and that's at least novel for the band. Weird Fishes/Arpeggi pretty much takes the band's quiet arpeggiated guitar shtick and milks it for all it's worth, but I won't lie and pretend I don't find the song very pretty from start to finish. All I Need (not so much lyrically, but definitely musically) kinda reminds me of a bunch of the songs from Brian Eno's Another Day on Earth, and while that's not very much to the band's credit (the band is emulating late period Brian Eno??), it's a rather intriguing listen, especially when the atmospheric piano chords pop up in the middle. The lyrics and the vocal delivery are pretty passionate, anyway.
Faust Arp is a quiet two-minute mix of acoustic balladry and somebody playing around on an Arp, but it's a decent enough track, and it has nice development to its melody for its length. Reckoner features a strong (acoustic) percussion part providing a good foundation for a decent Yorke vocal part and some nice bits of quiet guitar and keyboard. It's totally Radiohead-by-numbers, but Radiohead is a good enough band where that can work. House of Cards starts off seeming extremely, almost insultingly simple, with lyrics that would probably drive a lot of fans of the band nuts if they thought Yorke's lyrics on OK Computer were deep, but the vocal melody is absolutely ace, and there are some extremely nice production effects.
Jigsaw Falling Into Place is driven by the same paranoid acoustic-guitar/percussion groove we've heard from the band again and again, and it doesn't stand up to earlier instances of it, but the song is still quite ok. And finally, Videotape is a quiet piano ballad (with eerie percussion and some unsettling lyrics) that almost reminds me of something I'd expect from a Peter Gabriel album, and it's really not possible for me to dislike a ballad that fits that description.
So, in the end, while I'd definitely recommend this album in a heartbeat, I also really hope, as of this writing, that Radiohead avoids making another album like this for a good while. I mean, this is really nice and all, but this can't be the best they can do at this point, can it?
PS: So I eventually larned, from readers and otherwise, that only one of these songs was a long-time live staple, and that most was in fact written within a couple of years before the album. The internets have failed me again.
Chris Ray (chris.ray@hunterlink.net.au) (09/14/08)
This is one very even album, no particular highlights, but no
lowlights either. I do have a more favourable impression of the album
than you (Radiohead are my favourite band after all), and prefer it
slightly to Hail To The Thief. Although weirdly it wasn't until I
heard this album that I felt compelled to go back to Hail To The
Thief and listen to it more, gaining a new appreciation of it (a
similar thing occuring only once before with Tool's album 10000 Days
making me go back to Undertow in a new light).
Though it isn't true that this is an album of outtakes, with only the
track Nude dating back to an earlier album session (OK Computer),
which they didn't record at the time due to them not being able to
find the right sound for the song up until now. All the other songs
were written around 2005/06 and played live in 2006 on a brief tour
to test out the new material before they went back into the studio
and honed the sound of the songs to what they are like now.
Pablo Honey - 1993 Capitol
5 (8)
The Bends - 1995 Capitol
7 (11)
OK Computer - 1997 Capitol
8 (12)
*Kid A - 2000 Capitol*
10 (13)
Amnesiac - 2001 Capitol
8 (11)
I Might Be Wrong (Live Recordings) - 2001 Capitol
9 (12)
Hail To The Thief - 2003 Capitol
9 (13)
In Rainbows - 2007 Radiohead
8 (12)